{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,25]],"date-time":"2026-07-25T17:45:54Z","timestamp":1785001554893,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,4]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.80026","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,4]],"date-time":"2025-03-04T15:43:32Z","timestamp":1741103012000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Comparative Study of Vaginal Misoprostol Tablet Versus Dinoprostone Insert in Induction of Labor: A Prospective Interventional Analysis"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Vaishnavi","family":"Unni","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Subhashchandra R","family":"Mudanur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rajasri G","family":"Yaliwal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shreedevi","family":"Kori","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000752","article-title":"Induction of labor: An overview of guidelines","volume":"75","author":"Tsakiridis I","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A, Dagklis T. Induction of labor: An overview of guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2020, 75:61-72. 10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000752","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17794","article-title":"Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: An individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials","volume":"131","author":"Patabendige M","year":"2024","unstructured":"Patabendige M, Chan F, Vayssiere C, et al.. Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: An individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BJOG. 2024, 131:1167-80. 10.1111\/1471-0528.17794","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lansea.2024.100417","article-title":"Risk factors for labour induction and augmentation: A multicentre prospective cohort study in India","volume":"25","author":"Cheng TS","year":"2024","unstructured":"Cheng TS, Zahir F, Carolin SV, et al.. Risk factors for labour induction and augmentation: A multicentre prospective cohort study in India. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024, 25:100417. 10.1016\/j.lansea.2024.100417","journal-title":"Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18231\/j.ijogr.2021.097","article-title":"A comparative study of induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Dinoprostone gel and its fetomaternal outcome in a tertiary care hospital","volume":"8","author":"Valvi SS","year":"2021","unstructured":"Valvi SS, Airao BB. A comparative study of induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Dinoprostone gel and its fetomaternal outcome in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2021, 8:463-9. 10.18231\/j.ijogr.2021.097","journal-title":"Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res"},{"key":"ref5","article-title":"Comparative study of efficacy of misoprostol Vs Dinoprostone gel for induction of labour","volume":"17","author":"Gupta S","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gupta S, Hak J, Kumar D. Comparative study of efficacy of misoprostol Vs Dinoprostone gel for induction of labour. JK Science. 2015, 17:118-24.","journal-title":"JK Science"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10006-1893","article-title":"Comparative study of mifepristone with Dinoprostone gel in induction of labor in full-term pregnancy: An open-label randomized controlled trial","volume":"13","author":"Kumari S","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kumari S, Solanki V, Singh U, Mehrotra S. Comparative study of mifepristone with Dinoprostone gel in induction of labor in full-term pregnancy: An open-label randomized controlled trial. J South Asian Feder Obstet Gynae. 2021, 13:98-102. 10.5005\/jp-journals-10006-1893","journal-title":"J South Asian Feder Obstet Gynae"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0043-1770931","article-title":"Misoprostol use in obstetrics","volume":"45","author":"Nomura RM","year":"2023","unstructured":"Nomura RM, Nakamura-Pereira M, Nomura RM, et al.. Misoprostol use in obstetrics. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023, 45:356-68. 10.1055\/s-0043-1770931","journal-title":"Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001338.pub3","article-title":"Oral misoprostol for induction of labour","volume":"2014","author":"Alfirevic Z","year":"2014","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z, Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014, 2014:CD001338. 10.1002\/14651858.CD001338.pub3","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4238\/2015.September.9.25","article-title":"Responsivity to PGE2 labor induction involves concomitant differential prostaglandin E receptor gene expression in cervix and myometrium","volume":"14","author":"Konopka CK","year":"2015","unstructured":"Konopka CK, Glanzner WG, Rigo ML, et al.. Responsivity to PGE2 labor induction involves concomitant differential prostaglandin E receptor gene expression in cervix and myometrium. Genet Mol Res. 2015, 14:10877-87. 10.4238\/2015.September.9.25","journal-title":"Genet Mol Res"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003101.pub3","article-title":"Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term","volume":"2014","author":"Thomas J","year":"2014","unstructured":"Thomas J, Fairclough A, Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014, 2014:CD003101. 10.1002\/14651858.CD003101.pub3","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7827-2-70","article-title":"Comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: A randomized prospective study","volume":"2","author":"Papanikolaou EG","year":"2004","unstructured":"Papanikolaou EG, Plachouras N, Drougia A, et al.. Comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: A randomized prospective study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004, 2:70. 10.1186\/1477-7827-2-70","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-18948-5","article-title":"Comparative study of dinoprostone and misoprostol for induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 35\u00a0weeks","volume":"12","author":"Sire F","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sire F, Ponthier L, Eyraud JL, Catalan C, Aubard Y, Coste Mazeau P. Comparative study of dinoprostone and misoprostol for induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 35\u00a0weeks. Sci Rep. 2022, 12:14996. 10.1038\/s41598-022-18948-5","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2010.544424","article-title":"Maternal and prenatal factors influencing the outcome of prostaglandin E2 induced labour","volume":"31","author":"Memon F","year":"2011","unstructured":"Memon F, Wijesiriwardana A, Jonker L. Maternal and prenatal factors influencing the outcome of prostaglandin E2 induced labour. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011, 31:220-3. 10.3109\/01443615.2010.544424","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000941.pub2","article-title":"Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour","volume":"2010","author":"Hofmeyr GJ","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hofmeyr GJ, G\u00fclmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, 2010:CD000941. 10.1002\/14651858.CD000941.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref15","article-title":"A comparative study between oral misoprostol and intracervical Dinoprostone gel for induction of labour at term in primigravida. [PREPRINT]","author":"Swami KS","year":"2023","unstructured":"Swami KS, Sonawane PK. A comparative study between oral misoprostol and intracervical Dinoprostone gel for induction of labour at term in primigravida. [PREPRINT]. New Indian J OBGYN. 2023, 1-5.","journal-title":"New Indian J OBGYN"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/345822-comparative-study-of-vaginal-misoprostol-tablet-versus-dinoprostone-insert-in-induction-of-labor-a-prospective-interventional-analysis","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,4]],"date-time":"2025-03-04T15:43:35Z","timestamp":1741103015000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/345822-comparative-study-of-vaginal-misoprostol-tablet-versus-dinoprostone-insert-in-induction-of-labor-a-prospective-interventional-analysis"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,4]]},"references-count":15,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.80026","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,4]]}}}