{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,29]],"date-time":"2025-03-29T04:08:40Z","timestamp":1743221320923,"version":"3.40.3"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,28]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.81333","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,28]],"date-time":"2025-03-28T08:25:18Z","timestamp":1743150318000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of Hadlock and INTERGROWTH-21st Growth Charts for Estimating Fetal Weight in the Third Trimester via Ultrasound"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Rashi","family":"Saini","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sumitra","family":"Bachani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jyotsna","family":"Suri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Monika","family":"Gupta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Aprajita","family":"Gupta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Poornima","family":"Sharma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pradeep","family":"Debata","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","unstructured":"Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2013. (2014). Accessed. March 20, 2024: https:\/\/censusindia.gov.in\/nada\/index.php\/catalog\/34788\/download\/38476\/SRS_STAT_2013.pdf."},{"key":"ref2","unstructured":"Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2019 [Internet]. (2020). Accessed. March 20, 2024: https:\/\/censusindia.gov.in\/nada\/index.php\/catalog\/44375\/download\/48046\/SRS_STAT_2019.pdf."},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.010","article-title":"The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application","volume":"218","author":"Kiserud T","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kiserud T, Benachi A, Hecher K, Perez RG, Carvalho J, Piaggio G, Platt LD. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018, 218:S619-29. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20272","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth","volume":"53","author":"Salomon LJ","year":"2019","unstructured":"Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Da Silva Costa F, et al.. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019, 53:715-23. 10.1002\/uog.20272","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.155","article-title":"Ultrasonographic prediction of term birth weight: how accurate is it?","volume":"188","author":"Nahum GG","year":"2003","unstructured":"Nahum GG, Stanislaw H. Ultrasonographic prediction of term birth weight: how accurate is it?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003, 188:566-74. 10.1067\/mob.2003.155","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.150.2.6691115","article-title":"Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements","volume":"150","author":"Hadlock FP","year":"1984","unstructured":"Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology. 1984, 150:535-40. 10.1148\/radiology.150.2.6691115","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.593","article-title":"Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization Multicentre Growth Reference Study","volume":"218","author":"Grantz KL","year":"2018","unstructured":"Grantz KL, Hediger ML, Liu D, Buck Louis GM. Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018, 218:S641-55.e28. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.593","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(14)61490-2","article-title":"International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the fetal growth longitudinal study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project","volume":"384","author":"Papageorghiou AT","year":"2014","unstructured":"Papageorghiou AT, Ohuma EO, Altman DG, et al.. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the fetal growth longitudinal study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014, 384:869-79. 10.1016\/s0140-6736(14)61490-2","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1533945","article-title":"Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes","volume":"33","author":"Nwabuobi C","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nwabuobi C, Odibo L, Camisasca-Lopina H, Leavitt K, Tuuli M, Odibo AO. Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020, 33:1906-12. 10.1080\/14767058.2018.1533945","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-04324-0","article-title":"Which chart and which cut-point: deciding on the INTERGROWTH, World Health Organization, or Hadlock fetal growth chart","volume":"22","author":"Liauw J","year":"2022","unstructured":"Liauw J, Mayer C, Albert A, Fernandez A, Hutcheon JA. Which chart and which cut-point: deciding on the INTERGROWTH, World Health Organization, or Hadlock fetal growth chart. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022, 22:25. 10.1186\/s12884-021-04324-0","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002046","article-title":"Committee Opinion No 700: Methods for Estimating the Due Date","volume":"129","year":"2017","unstructured":"Committee Opinion No 700. Methods for Estimating the Due Date. Obstet Gynecol. 2017, 129:e150-4. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002046","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17514","article-title":"Prospective assessment of INTERGROWTH-21(st) and World Health Organization estimated fetal weight reference curves","volume":"51","author":"Cheng YK","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cheng YK, Lu J, Leung TY, Chan YM, Sahota DS. Prospective assessment of INTERGROWTH-21(st) and World Health Organization estimated fetal weight reference curves. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018, 51:792-8. 10.1002\/uog.17514","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20258","article-title":"Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates","volume":"53","author":"Ciobanu A","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ciobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019, 53:761-8. 10.1002\/uog.20258","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20391","article-title":"Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37\u2009weeks' gestation","volume":"54","author":"Akolekar R","year":"2019","unstructured":"Akolekar R, Panaitescu AM, Ciobanu A, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH. Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37\u2009weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019, 54:484-91. 10.1002\/uog.20391","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0043-102406","article-title":"Ultrasound versus clinical examination to estimate fetal weight at term","volume":"77","author":"Lanowski JS","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lanowski JS, Lanowski G, Schippert C, Drinkut K, Hillemanns P, Staboulidou I. Ultrasound versus clinical examination to estimate fetal weight at term. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017, 77:276-83. 10.1055\/s-0043-102406","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20299","article-title":"Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards","volume":"55","author":"Kabiri D","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kabiri D, Romero R, Gudicha DW, et al.. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020, 55:177-88. 10.1002\/uog.20299","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.15.02058","article-title":"Choice of formula and accuracy of fetal weight estimation in small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"35","author":"Melamed N","year":"2016","unstructured":"Melamed N, Ryan G, Windrim R, Toi A, Kingdom J. Choice of formula and accuracy of fetal weight estimation in small-for-gestational-age fetuses. J Ultrasound Med. 2016, 35:71-82. 10.7863\/ultra.15.02058","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1742271X17732807","article-title":"The accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in comparison to birth weight: a systematic review","volume":"26","author":"Milner J","year":"2018","unstructured":"Milner J, Arezina J. The accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in comparison to birth weight: a systematic review. Ultrasound. 2018, 26:32-41. 10.1177\/1742271X17732807","journal-title":"Ultrasound"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.011","article-title":"Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice\u00a0Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and\u00a0Human Development racial\/ethnic standard for the prediction\u00a0of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age","volume":"219","author":"Blue NR","year":"2018","unstructured":"Blue NR, Beddow ME, Savabi M, Katukuri VR, Chao CR. Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice\u00a0Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and\u00a0Human Development racial\/ethnic standard for the prediction\u00a0of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018, 219:474.e1-e12. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.012","article-title":"Comparison of the Hadlock and INTERGROWTH formulas\u00a0for calculating estimated fetal weight in\u00a0a\u00a0preterm population in France","volume":"219","author":"Monier I","year":"2018","unstructured":"Monier I, Ego A, Benachi A, Ancel PY, Goffinet F, Zeitlin J. Comparison of the Hadlock and INTERGROWTH formulas\u00a0for calculating estimated fetal weight in\u00a0a\u00a0preterm population in France. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018, 219:476.e1-e12. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/330746-comparison-of-hadlock-and-intergrowth-21st-growth-charts-for-estimating-fetal-weight-in-the-third-trimester-via-ultrasound","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,28]],"date-time":"2025-03-28T08:25:31Z","timestamp":1743150331000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/330746-comparison-of-hadlock-and-intergrowth-21st-growth-charts-for-estimating-fetal-weight-in-the-third-trimester-via-ultrasound"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,28]]},"references-count":20,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.81333","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,28]]}}}