{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,11]],"date-time":"2025-05-11T17:40:05Z","timestamp":1746985205809,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,11]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.83905","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,11]],"date-time":"2025-05-11T17:09:21Z","timestamp":1746983361000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Prophylactic Pelvic Drainage of Extraperitoneal Rectal Anastomoses: A Friend or a Foe?"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Iraklis","family":"Perysinakis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paraskevi","family":"Karona","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vasilis","family":"Christodoulou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dimosthenis","family":"Michelakis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Evangelia E","family":"Vassalou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eelco","family":"De Bree","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800730603","article-title":"Surgical drainage: an historical perspective","volume":"73","author":"Robinson JO","year":"1986","unstructured":"Robinson JO. Surgical drainage: an historical perspective. Br J Surg. 1986, 73:422-6. 10.1002\/bjs.1800730603","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0011-3840(92)90022-u","article-title":"The biology and practice of surgical drains. Part 1","volume":"29","author":"Dougherty SH","year":"1992","unstructured":"Dougherty SH, Simmons RL. The biology and practice of surgical drains. Part 1. Curr Probl Surg. 1992, 29:559-623. 10.1016\/0011-3840(92)90022-u","journal-title":"Curr Probl Surg"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000146149.17411.c5","article-title":"Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses","volume":"240","author":"Petrowsky H","year":"2004","unstructured":"Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V, Clavien PA. Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg. 2004, 240:1074-84; discussion 1084-5. 10.1097\/01.sla.0000146149.17411.c5","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.62713\/aic.3294","article-title":"Postoperative bowel obstruction as a rare complication of an abdominal drain","volume":"95","author":"Perysinakis I","year":"2024","unstructured":"Perysinakis I, Vassalou EE, Saridakis G, et al.. Postoperative bowel obstruction as a rare complication of an abdominal drain. Ann Ital Chir. 2024, 95:132-5. 10.62713\/aic.3294","journal-title":"Ann Ital Chir"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znac069","article-title":"Intraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: international matched, prospective, cohort study","volume":"109","year":"2022","unstructured":"Intraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery. international matched, prospective, cohort study. Br J Surg. 2022, 109:520-9. 10.1093\/bjs\/znac069","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD002100.pub2","article-title":"Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery","volume":"2004","author":"Jesus EC","year":"2004","unstructured":"Jesus EC, Karliczek A, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN. Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004, 2004:CD002100. 10.1002\/14651858.CD002100.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page MJ","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al.. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021, 372:n71. 10.1136\/bmj.n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(95)00134-4","article-title":"Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?","volume":"17","author":"Jadad AR","year":"1996","unstructured":"Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds JM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials. 1996, 17:1-12. 10.1016\/0197-2456(95)00134-4","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"ref9","unstructured":"The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-analyses. (2025). Accessed. January 9, 2025: http:\/\/www.ohri.ca\/programs\/clinical_epidemiology\/nos_manual.pdf."},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-6060(99)70205-9","article-title":"Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis? A multicenter controlled randomized trial","volume":"125","author":"Merad F","year":"1999","unstructured":"Merad F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, et al.. Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis? A multicenter controlled randomized trial. Surgery. 1999, 125:529-35.","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s101510170005","article-title":"A prospective randomised study of drains in infra-peritoneal rectal anastomoses","volume":"5","author":"Brown SR","year":"2001","unstructured":"Brown SR, Seow-Choen F, Eu KW, Heah SM, Tang CL. A prospective randomised study of drains in infra-peritoneal rectal anastomoses. Tech Coloproctol. 2001, 5:89-92. 10.1007\/s101510170005","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001991","article-title":"To drain or not to drain infraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal excision for cancer: the GRECCAR 5 randomized trial","volume":"265","author":"Denost Q","year":"2017","unstructured":"Denost Q, Rouanet P, Faucheron JL, et al.. To drain or not to drain infraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal excision for cancer: the GRECCAR 5 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2017, 265:474-80. 10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001991","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-022-01411-5","article-title":"Routine placement of abdominal drainage in pouch surgery does not impact on surgical outcomes","volume":"75","author":"Luberto A","year":"2023","unstructured":"Luberto A, Crippa J, Foppa C, et al.. Routine placement of abdominal drainage in pouch surgery does not impact on surgical outcomes. Updates Surg. 2023, 75:619-26. 10.1007\/s13304-022-01411-5","journal-title":"Updates Surg"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-020-04781-6","article-title":"Revisiting the value of drains after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a multi-institutional analysis of 996 patients","volume":"25","author":"Lee RM","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lee RM, Gamboa AC, Turgeon MK, et al.. Revisiting the value of drains after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a multi-institutional analysis of 996 patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021, 25:2000-10. 10.1007\/s11605-020-04781-6","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0000000000000517","article-title":"Pelvic drain after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer in patients with diverting stoma","volume":"28","author":"Matsuda K","year":"2018","unstructured":"Matsuda K, Yokoyama S, Hotta T, et al.. Pelvic drain after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer in patients with diverting stoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018, 28:82-5. 10.1097\/SLE.0000000000000517","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-024-04681-0","article-title":"Implementing a no-drain policy for extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis in a real-life setting: analysis of outcomes and surgeons' adherence","volume":"39","author":"Crippa J","year":"2024","unstructured":"Crippa J, Luberto A, Magistro C, et al.. Implementing a no-drain policy for extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis in a real-life setting: analysis of outcomes and surgeons' adherence. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024, 39:109. 10.1007\/s00384-024-04681-0","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003005","article-title":"Comment on \"To drain or not to drain infraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal excision for cancer: an unclosed debate\"","volume":"270","author":"Placer C","year":"2019","unstructured":"Placer C. Comment on \"To drain or not to drain infraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal excision for cancer: an unclosed debate\". Ann Surg. 2019, 270:e23-4. 10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003005","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-020-00837-z","article-title":"Italian multi-society modified Delphi consensus on the definition and management of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery","volume":"72","author":"Spinelli A","year":"2020","unstructured":"Spinelli A, Anania G, Arezzo A, et al.. Italian multi-society modified Delphi consensus on the definition and management of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Updates Surg. 2020, 72:781-92. 10.1007\/s13304-020-00837-z","journal-title":"Updates Surg"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajic.2008.03.002","article-title":"CDC\/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting","volume":"36","author":"Horan TC","year":"2008","unstructured":"Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC\/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008, 36:309-32. 10.1016\/j.ajic.2008.03.002","journal-title":"Am J Infect Control"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12618","article-title":"Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"16","author":"Pommergaard HC","year":"2014","unstructured":"Pommergaard HC, Gessler B, Burcharth J, Angenete E, Haglind E, Rosenberg J. Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2014, 16:662-71. 10.1111\/codi.12618","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12491","article-title":"To drain or not to drain extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"16","author":"Rondelli F","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rondelli F, Bugiantella W, Vedovati MC, et al.. To drain or not to drain extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2014, 16:O35-42. 10.1111\/codi.12491","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02055597","article-title":"Randomized trial of pelvic drainage after rectal resection","volume":"38","author":"Sagar PM","year":"1995","unstructured":"Sagar PM, Hartley MN, Macfie J, Mancey-Jones B, Sedman P, May J. Randomized trial of pelvic drainage after rectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995, 38:254-8. 10.1007\/BF02055597","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2010.11.014","article-title":"Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer","volume":"202","author":"Akiyoshi T","year":"2011","unstructured":"Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, et al.. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011, 202:259-64. 10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2010.11.014","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.4806","article-title":"Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer","volume":"92","author":"Peeters KC","year":"2005","unstructured":"Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, et al.. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005, 92:211-6. 10.1002\/bjs.4806","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"ref25","article-title":"Is routine drainage of pelvic anastomosis necessary?","volume":"62","author":"Scott H","year":"1996","unstructured":"Scott H, Brown AC. Is routine drainage of pelvic anastomosis necessary?. Am Surg. 1996, 62:452-7.","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"key":"ref26","article-title":"Retrospective analysis of the use of prophylactic drainage of the pelvis after anterior resection of the rectum (Article in Italian)","volume":"71","author":"Sica GS","year":"2000","unstructured":"Sica GS, Spiratou C, Sileri P, et al.. Retrospective analysis of the use of prophylactic drainage of the pelvis after anterior resection of the rectum (Article in Italian). Ann Ital Chir. 2000, 71:367-72.","journal-title":"Ann Ital Chir"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000150067.99651.6a","article-title":"Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients","volume":"241","author":"Yeh CY","year":"2005","unstructured":"Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY, Chen JS, Chen HH, Chiang JM, Tang R. Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg. 2005, 241:9-13. 10.1097\/01.sla.0000150067.99651.6a","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000485139","article-title":"A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the use of suction drains following rectal surgery","volume":"35","author":"Guerra F","year":"2018","unstructured":"Guerra F, Giuliani G, Coletta D, Boni M, Rondelli F, Bianchi PP, Coratti A. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the use of suction drains following rectal surgery. Dig Surg. 2018, 35:482-90. 10.1159\/000485139","journal-title":"Dig Surg"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-017-2891-8","article-title":"Prophylactic pelvic drainage after rectal resection with extraperitoneal anastomosis: is it worthwhile? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"32","author":"Menahem B","year":"2017","unstructured":"Menahem B, Vallois A, Alves A, Lubrano J. Prophylactic pelvic drainage after rectal resection with extraperitoneal anastomosis: is it worthwhile? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017, 32:1531-8. 10.1007\/s00384-017-2891-8","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2019.05.006","article-title":"Prophylactic intra-abdominal drainage following colorectal anastomoses. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"219","author":"Podda M","year":"2020","unstructured":"Podda M, Di Saverio S, Davies RJ, et al.. Prophylactic intra-abdominal drainage following colorectal anastomoses. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Surg. 2020, 219:164-74. 10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2019.05.006","journal-title":"Am J Surg"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/362152-prophylactic-pelvic-drainage-of-extraperitoneal-rectal-anastomoses-a-friend-or-a-foe","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,11]],"date-time":"2025-05-11T17:09:22Z","timestamp":1746983362000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/362152-prophylactic-pelvic-drainage-of-extraperitoneal-rectal-anastomoses-a-friend-or-a-foe"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,11]]},"references-count":30,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.83905","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,11]]}}}