{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,16]],"date-time":"2026-07-16T21:27:54Z","timestamp":1784237274039,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,25]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.84769","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,25]],"date-time":"2025-05-25T12:55:13Z","timestamp":1748177713000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["I2 Statistic as a Test for Selection Bias in Randomised Controlled Trials"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Steffen","family":"Mickenautsch","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Veerasamy","family":"Yengopal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1186","article-title":"Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Higgins JP","year":"2002","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002, 21:1539-58. 10.1002\/sim.1186","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.58961","article-title":"Trial number and sample size do not affect the accuracy of the I2-point estimate for testing selection bias risk in meta-analyses","volume":"16","author":"Mickenautsch S","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Trial number and sample size do not affect the accuracy of the I2-point estimate for testing selection bias risk in meta-analyses. Cureus. 2024, 16:e58961. 10.7759\/cureus.58961","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2014.04.007","article-title":"A methodological review of recent meta-analyses has found significant heterogeneity in age between randomized groups","volume":"67","author":"Clark L","year":"2014","unstructured":"Clark L, Fairhurst C, Hewitt CE, et al.. A methodological review of recent meta-analyses has found significant heterogeneity in age between randomized groups. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014, 67:1016-24. 10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2014.04.007","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/0470863641","article-title":"Selection bias and covariate imbalances in randomized clinical trials","author":"Berger V","year":"2007","unstructured":"Berger V. Selection bias and covariate imbalances in randomized clinical trials. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ; 2007. 10.1002\/0470863641"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2017.10.001","article-title":"A simple technique investigating baseline heterogeneity helped to eliminate potential bias in meta-analyses","volume":"95","author":"Hicks A","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hicks A, Fairhurst C, Torgerson DJ. A simple technique investigating baseline heterogeneity helped to eliminate potential bias in meta-analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018, 95:55-62. 10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2017.10.001","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.60346","article-title":"A test method for identifying selection bias risk in prospective controlled clinical therapy trials using the I2 point estimate","volume":"16","author":"Mickenautsch S","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. A test method for identifying selection bias risk in prospective controlled clinical therapy trials using the I2 point estimate. Cureus. 2024, 16:e60346. 10.7759\/cureus.60346","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.68911","article-title":"The I2 test for selection bias risk assessment in single trials: recommended simulated comparator trial (SCT) settings","volume":"16","author":"Mickenautsch S","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. The I2 test for selection bias risk assessment in single trials: recommended simulated comparator trial (SCT) settings. Cureus. 2024, 16:e68911. 10.7759\/cureus.68911","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.71668","article-title":"Trial-adjusted versus generic simulated comparator trial (SCT) settings for selection bias appraisal using the I2 test","volume":"16","author":"Mickenautsch S","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Trial-adjusted versus generic simulated comparator trial (SCT) settings for selection bias appraisal using the I2 test. Cureus. 2024, 16:e71668. 10.7759\/cureus.71668","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/3001666","article-title":"The combination of estimates from different experiments","volume":"10","author":"Cochrane W","year":"1954","unstructured":"Cochrane W. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954, 10:101-29. 10.2307\/3001666","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-8-79","article-title":"Undue reliance on I(2) in assessing heterogeneity may mislead","volume":"8","author":"R\u00fccker G","year":"2008","unstructured":"R\u00fccker G, Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, Schumacher M. Undue reliance on I(2) in assessing heterogeneity may mislead. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008, 8:79. 10.1186\/1471-2288-8-79","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins JP","year":"2003","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003, 327:557-60. 10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jep.13159","article-title":"Comparison of four heterogeneity measures for meta-analysis","volume":"26","author":"Lin L","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lin L. Comparison of four heterogeneity measures for meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020, 26:376-84. 10.1111\/jep.13159","journal-title":"J Eval Clin Pract"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/373473-i2-statistic-as-a-test-for-selection-bias-in-randomised-controlled-trials","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,25]],"date-time":"2025-05-25T12:55:14Z","timestamp":1748177714000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/373473-i2-statistic-as-a-test-for-selection-bias-in-randomised-controlled-trials"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,25]]},"references-count":12,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.84769","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,25]]}}}