{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T16:19:19Z","timestamp":1754151559308,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,19]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.88277","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,19]],"date-time":"2025-07-19T07:19:17Z","timestamp":1752909557000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks: A Systematic Review"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Abeer","family":"Ahmed","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hanady ME","family":"M Osman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nada Salaheldin","family":"Suliman Ali","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Salma Mohammed","family":"Elbashir Salih Ahmed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Habab Mohamed","family":"Musa Mohamed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hoyam Mutasim","family":"Yousif Bakheit","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alkhansaa Mahmod","family":"Mohamed Alhag","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.03.019","article-title":"The role of labor induction in modern obstetrics","volume":"230","author":"Grobman WA","year":"2024","unstructured":"Grobman WA. The role of labor induction in modern obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024, 230:S662-8. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.03.019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xagr.2022.100099","article-title":"Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future","volume":"2","author":"McCarthy CM","year":"2022","unstructured":"McCarthy CM, Meaney S, McCarthy M, Conners N, Russell N. Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022, 2:100099. 10.1016\/j.xagr.2022.100099","journal-title":"AJOG Glob Rep"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyae088","article-title":"Epidemiology of elective induction of labour: a timeless exposure","volume":"53","author":"Snowden JM","year":"2024","unstructured":"Snowden JM, Bane S, Osmundson SS, Odden MC, Carmichael SL. Epidemiology of elective induction of labour: a timeless exposure. Int J Epidemiol. 2024, 53:10.1093\/ije\/dyae088","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000031","article-title":"Global perspectives on elective induction of labor","volume":"57","author":"Vogel JP","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vogel JP, G\u00fclmezoglu AM, Hofmeyr GJ, Temmerman M. Global perspectives on elective induction of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014, 57:331-42. 10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000031","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman WA","year":"2018","unstructured":"Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, et al.. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018, 379:513-23. 10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20140","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis","volume":"53","author":"Sotiriadis A","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sotiriadis A, Petousis S, Thilaganathan B, et al.. Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019, 53:26-35. 10.1002\/uog.20140","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007","article-title":"Induction of labour in low-risk pregnancies before 40 weeks of gestation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials","volume":"79","author":"Dong S","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dong S, Bapoo S, Shukla M, Abbasi N, Horn D, D'Souza R. Induction of labour in low-risk pregnancies before 40 weeks of gestation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022, 79:107-25. 10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2547-4196","article-title":"Association between induction start time and labor duration in nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor [IN PRESS]","author":"Facco FL","year":"2025","unstructured":"Facco FL, MacPherson C, Reddy UM, et al.. Association between induction start time and labor duration in nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor [IN PRESS]. Am J Perinatol. 2025, 10.1055\/a-2547-4196","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page MJ","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al.. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021, 372:n71. 10.1136\/bmj.n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref10","article-title":"The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses","author":"Wells GA","year":"2000","unstructured":"Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. 2000,","journal-title":"The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","article-title":"RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"366","author":"Sterne JA","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sterne JA, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ, et al.. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019, 366:l4898. 10.1136\/bmj.l4898","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21608\/muj.2025.373189.1223","article-title":"The role of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks gestation in reducing the rate of cesarean section in nulliparous pregnant females: a prospective cohort study [IN PRESS]","author":"Elhoseny MS","year":"2025","unstructured":"Elhoseny MS, Elrefaie WE, Younis MH, Arafa IA. The role of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks gestation in reducing the rate of cesarean section in nulliparous pregnant females: a prospective cohort study [IN PRESS]. Medicine Updates. 2025, 10.21608\/muj.2025.373189.1223","journal-title":"Medicine Updates"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103076","article-title":"Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse outcomes following planned birth at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk women: a population based cohort study","volume":"80","author":"Crawford K","year":"2025","unstructured":"Crawford K, Carlo WA, Odibo A, Papageorghiou A, Tarnow-Mordi W, Kumar S. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse outcomes following planned birth at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk women: a population based cohort study. EClinicalMedicine. 2025, 80:103076. 10.1016\/j.eclinm.2025.103076","journal-title":"EClinicalMedicine"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13989","article-title":"Cesarean delivery after non-medically indicated induction of labor: A population-based study using different definitions of expectant management","volume":"100","author":"Zenzmaier C","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zenzmaier C, Pfeifer B, Leitner H, K\u00f6nig-Bachmann M. Cesarean delivery after non-medically indicated induction of labor: A population-based study using different definitions of expectant management. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021, 100:220-8. 10.1111\/aogs.13989","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e2838","article-title":"Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study","volume":"344","author":"Stock SJ","year":"2012","unstructured":"Stock SJ, Ferguson E, Duffy A, Ford I, Chalmers J, Norman JE. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study. BMJ. 2012, 344:e2838. 10.1136\/bmj.e2838","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.223","article-title":"Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term","volume":"220","author":"Souter V","year":"2019","unstructured":"Souter V, Painter I, Sitcov K, Caughey AB. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019, 220:273.e1-273.e11. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.223","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003371","article-title":"Elective induction of labor in the 39th week of gestation compared with expectant management of low-risk multiparous women","volume":"134","author":"Sinkey RG","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sinkey RG, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM, et al.. Elective induction of labor in the 39th week of gestation compared with expectant management of low-risk multiparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2019, 134:282-7. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003371","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1807505","article-title":"Outcomes of labor induction at 39 weeks in pregnancies with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"35","author":"Park BY","year":"2022","unstructured":"Park BY, Cryer A, Betoni J, McLean L, Figueroa H, Contag SA, Yao R. Outcomes of labor induction at 39 weeks in pregnancies with a prior cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022, 35:2853-8. 10.1080\/14767058.2020.1807505","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1688471","article-title":"Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at \u226539 Weeks","volume":"37","author":"Palatnik A","year":"2020","unstructured":"Palatnik A, Kominiarek MA. Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at \u226539 Weeks. Am J Perinatol. 2020, 37:695-707. 10.1055\/s-0039-1688471","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13807","article-title":"Term elective induction of labour and perinatal outcomes in obese women: retrospective cohort study","volume":"123","author":"Lee VR","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lee VR, Darney BG, Snowden JM, Main EK, Gilbert W, Chung J, Caughey AB. Term elective induction of labour and perinatal outcomes in obese women: retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2016, 123:271-8. 10.1111\/1471-0528.13807","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000922","article-title":"Outcomes of term induction in trial of labor after cesarean delivery: analysis of a modern obstetric cohort","volume":"126","author":"Lappen JR","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lappen JR, Hackney DN, Bailit JL. Outcomes of term induction in trial of labor after cesarean delivery: analysis of a modern obstetric cohort. Obstet Gynecol. 2015, 126:115-23. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000922","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies","volume":"211","author":"Gibson KS","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gibson KS, Waters TP, Bailit JL. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014, 211:249.e1-249.e16. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002408","article-title":"Term elective induction of labor and pregnancy outcomes among obese women and their offspring","volume":"131","author":"Gibbs Pickens CM","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gibbs Pickens CM, Kramer MR, Howards PP, Badell ML, Caughey AB, Hogue CJ. Term elective induction of labor and pregnancy outcomes among obese women and their offspring. Obstet Gynecol. 2018, 131:12-22. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002408","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a6a4d0","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"122","author":"Darney BG","year":"2013","unstructured":"Darney BG, Snowden JM, Cheng YW, et al.. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2013, 122:761-9. 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a6a4d0","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03248.x","article-title":"Impending macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery?","volume":"119","author":"Cheng YW","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cheng YW, Sparks TN, Laros RK Jr, Nicholson JM, Caughey AB. Impending macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery?. BJOG. 2012, 119:402-9. 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03248.x","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.054","article-title":"Nonmedically indicated induction vs expectant treatment in term nulliparous women","volume":"212","author":"Bailit JL","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bailit JL, Grobman W, Zhao Y, et al.. Nonmedically indicated induction vs expectant treatment in term nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015, 212:103.e1-7. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.054","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-047040","article-title":"Intrapartum interventions and outcomes for women and children following induction of labour at term in uncomplicated pregnancies: a 16-year population-based linked data study","volume":"11","author":"Dahlen HG","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dahlen HG, Thornton C, Downe S, et al.. Intrapartum interventions and outcomes for women and children following induction of labour at term in uncomplicated pregnancies: a 16-year population-based linked data study. BMJ Open. 2021, 11:e047040. 10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-047040","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004928","article-title":"Roe v Wade and the threat to fertility care","volume":"140","author":"Feinberg EC","year":"2022","unstructured":"Feinberg EC, Kawwass JF, Cedars MI. Roe v Wade and the threat to fertility care. Obstet Gynecol. 2022, 140:557-9. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004928","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2023.13162","article-title":"Comparison of maternal labor-related complications and neonatal outcomes following elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation vs expectant management: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"6","author":"Hong J","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hong J, Atkinson J, Roddy Mitchell A, et al.. Comparison of maternal labor-related complications and neonatal outcomes following elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation vs expectant management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2023, 6:e2313162. 10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2023.13162","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/390138-neonatal-outcomes-following-elective-induction-of-labor-at-39-weeks-a-systematic-review","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,19]],"date-time":"2025-07-19T07:19:18Z","timestamp":1752909558000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/390138-neonatal-outcomes-following-elective-induction-of-labor-at-39-weeks-a-systematic-review"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,19]]},"references-count":29,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.88277","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,19]]}}}