{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,28]],"date-time":"2025-11-28T20:58:20Z","timestamp":1764363500428,"version":"3.46.0"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,28]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.98033","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,28]],"date-time":"2025-11-28T20:55:01Z","timestamp":1764363301000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Improving Visual Field Testing Reliability by Using an Educational Patient Leaflet"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Basil","family":"Suresh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sam","family":"Kathiramalai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Harikesh","family":"Kaneshayogan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0420.1998.760408.x","article-title":"SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma","volume":"76","author":"Bengtsson B","year":"1998","unstructured":"Bengtsson B, Heijl A. SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998, 76:431-7. 10.1034\/j.1600-0420.1998.760408.x","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4274\/tjo.galenos.2025.85666","article-title":"Comparison of Humphrey 24-2 SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and SITA Faster Test Strategies in Patients with Glaucoma","volume":"55","author":"K\u00f6ksald\u0131 S","year":"2025","unstructured":"K\u00f6ksald\u0131 S, Ar\u0131kan G, Dada\u015f \u00d6F, G\u00fcnen\u00e7 \u00dc. Comparison of Humphrey 24-2 SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and SITA Faster Test Strategies in Patients with Glaucoma. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2025, 55:67-73. 10.4274\/tjo.galenos.2025.85666","journal-title":"Turk J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.12-10268","article-title":"Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season","volume":"53","author":"Junoy Montolio FG","year":"2012","unstructured":"Junoy Montolio FG, Wesselink C, Gordijn M, Jansonius NM. Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012, 53:7010-7. 10.1167\/iovs.12-10268","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.9.1.4","article-title":"Factors predicting a greater likelihood of poor visual field reliability in glaucoma patients and suspects","volume":"9","author":"Aboobakar IF","year":"2020","unstructured":"Aboobakar IF, Wang J, Chauhan BC, Boland MV, Friedman DS, Ramulu PY, Yohannan J. Factors predicting a greater likelihood of poor visual field reliability in glaucoma patients and suspects. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020, 9:4. 10.1167\/tvst.9.1.4","journal-title":"Transl Vis Sci Technol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.87.2.153","article-title":"Effect of a patient training video on visual field test reliability","volume":"87","author":"Sherafat H","year":"2003","unstructured":"Sherafat H, Spry PG, Waldock A, Sparrow JM, Diamond JP. Effect of a patient training video on visual field test reliability. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003, 87:153-6. 10.1136\/bjo.87.2.153","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_1499_22","article-title":"Comparison of the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing","volume":"71","author":"Maheshwari D","year":"2023","unstructured":"Maheshwari D, Nair A, Tara TD, Pawar N, Ramakrishnan R, Selvi DR, Uduman MS. Comparison of the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023, 71:569-74. 10.4103\/ijo.IJO_1499_22","journal-title":"Indian J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/08820538.2017.1416413","article-title":"Impact of different visual field instruction strategies on reliability indices","volume":"33","author":"Rao A","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rao A, Sarangi SP, Padhy D, Raj N, Das G. Impact of different visual field instruction strategies on reliability indices. Semin Ophthalmol. 2018, 33:683-9. 10.1080\/08820538.2017.1416413","journal-title":"Semin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.08.002","article-title":"The effect of testing reliability on visual field sensitivity in normal eyes: the Singapore Chinese eye study","volume":"125","author":"Tan NY","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tan NY, Tham YC, Koh V, et al.. The effect of testing reliability on visual field sensitivity in normal eyes: the Singapore Chinese eye study. Ophthalmology. 2018, 125:15-21. 10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.08.002","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.35119\/myjo.v4i2.249","article-title":"Effect of a patient educational video on visual field test reliability","volume":"4","author":"Lee HY","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lee HY, Ramli N, Saharuddin NA, Siti Faeza HS, Ong PY. Effect of a patient educational video on visual field test reliability. Malays J Ophthalmol. 2022, 4:123-36. 10.35119\/myjo.v4i2.249","journal-title":"Malays J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/19915","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of enhanced patient instructions for bowel preparation before colonoscopy: network meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials","volume":"23","author":"Tian X","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tian X, Yi LJ, Han Y, Chen H, Liu XL, Chen WQ, Jim\u00e9nez-Herrera MF. Comparative effectiveness of enhanced patient instructions for bowel preparation before colonoscopy: network meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2021, 23:e19915. 10.2196\/19915","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.25122\/jml-2022-0133","article-title":"Impact of extended pre-scan written instructions on motion artifacts during head magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"15","author":"Salih S","year":"2022","unstructured":"Salih S, Abdulaal O, Gameraddin M, Alhasan M, Hasaneen M. Impact of extended pre-scan written instructions on motion artifacts during head magnetic resonance imaging. J Med Life. 2022, 15:1181-3.","journal-title":"J Med Life"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2014.3609","article-title":"Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma","volume":"133","author":"Rao HL","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rao HL, Yadav RK, Begum VU, Addepalli UK, Choudhari NS, Senthil S, Garudadri CS. Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015, 133:40-4. 10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2014.3609","journal-title":"JAMA Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref13","article-title":"False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability?","volume":"41","author":"Bengtsson B","year":"2000","unstructured":"Bengtsson B, Heijl A. False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability?. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000, 41:2201-4.","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.05-1598","article-title":"Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm","volume":"47","author":"Newkirk MR","year":"2006","unstructured":"Newkirk MR, Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Johnson CA. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006, 47:4632-7. 10.1167\/iovs.05-1598","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.04.035","article-title":"Evidence-based criteria for assessment of visual field reliability","volume":"124","author":"Yohannan J","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yohannan J, Wang J, Brown J, Chauhan BC, Boland MV, Friedman DS, Ramulu PY. Evidence-based criteria for assessment of visual field reliability. Ophthalmology. 2017, 124:1612-20. 10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.04.035","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref16","article-title":"Humphrey Visual Field","author":"Ruia S","year":"2025","unstructured":"Ruia S, Tripathy K. Humphrey Visual Field. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL); 2025."},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.14069","article-title":"Does eye examination order for standard automated perimetry matter?","volume":"97","author":"Kelly SR","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kelly SR, Bryan SR, Crabb DP. Does eye examination order for standard automated perimetry matter?. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019, 97:e833-8. 10.1111\/aos.14069","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.preteyeres.2024.101307","article-title":"Standard automated perimetry for glaucoma and diseases of the retina and visual pathways: current and future perspectives","volume":"104","author":"Phu J","year":"2025","unstructured":"Phu J, Khuu SK, Nivison-Smith L, Kalloniatis M. Standard automated perimetry for glaucoma and diseases of the retina and visual pathways: current and future perspectives. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2025, 104:101307. 10.1016\/j.preteyeres.2024.101307","journal-title":"Prog Retin Eye Res"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2018.10.010","article-title":"A new Sita perimetric threshold testing algorithm: construction and a multicenter clinical study","volume":"198","author":"Heijl A","year":"2019","unstructured":"Heijl A, Patella VM, Chong LX, et al.. A new Sita perimetric threshold testing algorithm: construction and a multicenter clinical study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019, 198:154-65. 10.1016\/j.ajo.2018.10.010","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1590\/s0004-27492008000400011","article-title":"Learning effect of standard automated perimetry in healthy individuals","volume":"71","author":"Castro DP","year":"2008","unstructured":"Castro DP, Kawase J, Melo LA Jr. Learning effect of standard automated perimetry in healthy individuals. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008, 71:523-8. 10.1590\/s0004-27492008000400011","journal-title":"Arq Bras Oftalmol"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/437188-improving-visual-field-testing-reliability-by-using-an-educational-patient-leaflet","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,28]],"date-time":"2025-11-28T20:55:02Z","timestamp":1764363302000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/437188-improving-visual-field-testing-reliability-by-using-an-educational-patient-leaflet"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,28]]},"references-count":20,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.98033","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,28]]}}}