{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,12]],"date-time":"2025-12-12T12:40:50Z","timestamp":1765543250199,"version":"3.48.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,12]]},"DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.99038","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,12]],"date-time":"2025-12-12T12:36:41Z","timestamp":1765543001000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Anterior-Only Sacrocolpopexy Complicated by Obstructive Enterocele: Should Both Compartments Always Be Repaired?"],"prefix":"10.7759","author":[{"given":"Leandro","family":"Nobrega","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Boris","family":"Schiltz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jerome","family":"Mathis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Caroline","family":"Eggemann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-025-06049-6","article-title":"Global trends in prevalence and future projections of pelvic organ prolapse: a 30-year epidemiological study","volume":"36","author":"Li P","year":"2025","unstructured":"Li P, Ma H, Zhang J, Zhang Q. Global trends in prevalence and future projections of pelvic organ prolapse: a 30-year epidemiological study. Int Urogynecol J. 2025, 36:991-1002. 10.1007\/s00192-025-06049-6","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0276788","article-title":"Pelvic organ prolapse: the lived experience","volume":"17","author":"Carroll L","year":"2022","unstructured":"Carroll L, O' Sullivan C, Doody C, Perrotta C, Fullen B. Pelvic organ prolapse: the lived experience. PLoS One. 2022, 17:e0276788. 10.1371\/journal.pone.0276788","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13071896","article-title":"A qualitative exploration of the perceptions of women living with pelvic floor disorders and factors related to quality of life","volume":"13","author":"Rodr\u00edguez-Almagro J","year":"2024","unstructured":"Rodr\u00edguez-Almagro J, Hern\u00e1ndez Mart\u00ednez A, Mart\u00ednez-V\u00e1zquez S, Peinado Molina RA, Bermejo-Cantarero A, Mart\u00ednez-Galiano JM. A qualitative exploration of the perceptions of women living with pelvic floor disorders and factors related to quality of life. J Clin Med. 2024, 13:10.3390\/jcm13071896","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD012376.pub2","article-title":"Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse","volume":"7","author":"Maher C","year":"2023","unstructured":"Maher C, Yeung E, Haya N, Christmann-Schmid C, Mowat A, Chen Z, Baessler K. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023, 7:CD012376. 10.1002\/14651858.CD012376.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05408-x","article-title":"A systematic review of the surgical management of apical pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"34","author":"Chan CY","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chan CY, Fernandes RA, Yao HH, O'Connell HE, Tse V, Gani J. A systematic review of the surgical management of apical pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2023, 34:825-41. 10.1007\/s00192-022-05408-x","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.1719","article-title":"Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial","volume":"311","author":"Barber MD","year":"2014","unstructured":"Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, et al.. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2014, 311:1023-34. 10.1001\/jama.2014.1719","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.2827","article-title":"Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial","volume":"319","author":"Jelovsek JE","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, et al.. Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018, 319:1554-65. 10.1001\/jama.2018.2827","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.037","article-title":"Outcomes of sacrocolpopexy\/sacrohysteropexy with mesh placement targeted to affected compartment","volume":"272","author":"Rusavy Z","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rusavy Z, Najib B, Abdelkhalek Y, Grinstein E, Gluck O, Deval B. Outcomes of sacrocolpopexy\/sacrohysteropexy with mesh placement targeted to affected compartment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022, 272:188-92. 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.03.037","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2004.01.004","article-title":"Laparoscopic promontory sacral colpopexy: is the posterior, recto-vaginal, mesh mandatory?","volume":"45","author":"Antiphon P","year":"2004","unstructured":"Antiphon P, Elard S, Benyoussef A, et al.. Laparoscopic promontory sacral colpopexy: is the posterior, recto-vaginal, mesh mandatory?. Eur Urol. 2004, 45:655-61. 10.1016\/j.eururo.2004.01.004","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.03.025","article-title":"Posterior mesh fixation versus non-fixation in sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"309","author":"Di Biasi J","year":"2025","unstructured":"Di Biasi J, Ruggieri S, Taccaliti C, et al.. Posterior mesh fixation versus non-fixation in sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025, 309:1-6. 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.03.025","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12325-016-0425-3","article-title":"Reasons for and against use of non-absorbable, synthetic mesh during pelvic organ prolapse repair, according to the prolapsed compartment","volume":"33","author":"Kontogiannis S","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kontogiannis S, Goulimi E, Giannitsas K. Reasons for and against use of non-absorbable, synthetic mesh during pelvic organ prolapse repair, according to the prolapsed compartment. Adv Ther. 2017, 33:2139-49. 10.1007\/s12325-016-0425-3","journal-title":"Adv Ther"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003380","article-title":"Long-term assessment of a prospective cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy","volume":"134","author":"Pacqu\u00e9e S","year":"2019","unstructured":"Pacqu\u00e9e S, Nawapun K, Claerhout F, et al.. Long-term assessment of a prospective cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2019, 134:323-32. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003380","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-024-07719-4","article-title":"Post-operative outcomes associated with anterior mesh location after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy","volume":"310","author":"Habib N","year":"2024","unstructured":"Habib N, Giorgi M, Tahtouh T, Hamdi A, Centini G, Cannoni A, Bader G. Post-operative outcomes associated with anterior mesh location after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024, 310:2717-24. 10.1007\/s00404-024-07719-4","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05430-z","article-title":"Long term follow-up after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy","volume":"34","author":"Khalil N","year":"2023","unstructured":"Khalil N, Moubarak M, Alkassis M, Kassis N, Moukarzel M, Atallah D. Long term follow-up after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2023, 34:1279-83. 10.1007\/s00192-022-05430-z","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1695-1","article-title":"Anatomic and functional outcomes of sacrocolpopexy with or without posterior colporrhaphy","volume":"23","author":"Kaser DJ","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kaser DJ, Kinsler EL, Mackenzie TA, Hanissian P, Strohbehn K, Whiteside JL. Anatomic and functional outcomes of sacrocolpopexy with or without posterior colporrhaphy. Int Urogynecol J. 2012, 23:1215-20. 10.1007\/s00192-012-1695-1","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.023","article-title":"Bowel symptoms in women 1 year after sacrocolpopexy","volume":"197","author":"Bradley CS","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bradley CS, Nygaard IE, Brown MB, et al.. Bowel symptoms in women 1 year after sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007, 197:642.e1-8. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SMJ.0b013e31829ba4ab","article-title":"Outlet constipation 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant posterior repair","volume":"106","author":"Crane AK","year":"2013","unstructured":"Crane AK, Geller EJ, Matthews CA. Outlet constipation 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant posterior repair. South Med J. 2013, 106:409-14. 10.1097\/SMJ.0b013e31829ba4ab","journal-title":"South Med J"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0029-7844(00)01205-9","article-title":"Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and anatomy and function of the posterior compartment","volume":"97","author":"Baessler K","year":"2001","unstructured":"Baessler K, Schuessler B. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and anatomy and function of the posterior compartment. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001, 97:678-84. 10.1016\/s0029-7844(00)01205-9","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04526-8","article-title":"National survey of surgical practices: sacropexy in France in 2019","volume":"32","author":"Rebahi C","year":"2021","unstructured":"Rebahi C, Cardaillac C, Cosson M, et al.. National survey of surgical practices: sacropexy in France in 2019. Int Urogynecol J. 2021, 32:975-91. 10.1007\/s00192-020-04526-8","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.12.029","article-title":"Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive literature review on current practice","volume":"245","author":"Gluck O","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gluck O, Blaganje M, Veit-Rubin N, et al.. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive literature review on current practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020, 245:94-101. 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.12.029","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e318289c018","article-title":"Guidelines for privileging and credentialing physicians for sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"19","year":"2013","unstructured":"Guidelines for privileging and credentialing physicians for sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013, 19.62-5. 10.1097\/SPV.0b013e318289c018","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000570","article-title":"Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"125","author":"Siddiqui NY","year":"2015","unstructured":"Siddiqui NY, Grimes CL, Casiano ER, et al.. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015, 125:44-55. 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000570","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-03952-7","article-title":"Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy","volume":"30","author":"Baines G","year":"2019","unstructured":"Baines G, Price N, Jefferis H, Cartwright R, Jackson SR. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2019, 30:1475-81. 10.1007\/s00192-019-03952-7","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"}],"container-title":["Cureus"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/441868-anterior-only-sacrocolpopexy-complicated-by-obstructive-enterocele-should-both-compartments-always-be-repaired","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,12]],"date-time":"2025-12-12T12:36:42Z","timestamp":1765543002000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cureus.com\/articles\/441868-anterior-only-sacrocolpopexy-complicated-by-obstructive-enterocele-should-both-compartments-always-be-repaired"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,12]]},"references-count":23,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.99038","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-8184"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2168-8184","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,12]]}}}