{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,3]],"date-time":"2026-02-03T20:38:44Z","timestamp":1770151124842,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,1]],"date-time":"2013-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1377993600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J of Ultrasound Medicine"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the use of customized fetal reference standards improves the prenatal detection of intrauterine growth restriction.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Singleton pregnancies with a diagnosis of a small\u2010for\u2010gestational\u2010age (SGA) fetus based on the in utero reference standard of Hadlock et al (<jats:italic>Am J Obstet Gynecol<\/jats:italic> 1985; 151:333\u2013337; <jats:italic>Radiology<\/jats:italic> 1991; 181:129\u2013133) were identified from our ultrasound database, and customized percentiles were calculated by adjusting for maternal height, weight, ethnicity, parity, and sex.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>A total of 300 pregnancies were identified as SGA by both the Hadlock and customized standards, and 60 were identified as SGA by the Hadlock standard only. Small\u2010for\u2010gestational age pregnancies identified by the Hadlock standard only were significantly less likely to have any abnormal sonographic findings, including an elevated head to abdominal circumference ratio (8.3% versus 21.7%; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = .019), oligohydramnios (3.3% versus 13%; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = .027), abnormal umbilical artery Doppler findings (3.4% versus 14.7%; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = .017), maternal hypertensive disease (3.3% versus 12.7%; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = .041), and preterm delivery (6.7% versus 27.7%; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; .001). There was no difference in neonatal intensive care unit admission rates; however, neonates identified as SGA by the Hadlock standard only were less likely to have a postnatal diagnosis of SGA (9.1% versus 78.3%; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; .001) and had a shorter neonatal intensive care unit stay (median, 2 versus 8 days; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; .001).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Using a customized standard, we have identified a population of pregnancies with low rates of antenatal complications and sonographic findings associated with pathologic growth. Adoption of customized standards to improve our antenatal detection rate of intrauterine growth restriction may decrease the need for intervention in healthy but constitutionally small fetuses.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.32.9.1581","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,8,26]],"date-time":"2013-08-26T20:59:27Z","timestamp":1377550767000},"page":"1581-1586","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Improving Antenatal Prediction of Small\u2010for\u2010Gestational\u2010Age Neonates by Using Customized Versus Population\u2010Based Reference Standards"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"Inna V.","family":"Landres","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Aundrea","family":"Clark","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Stephen T.","family":"Chasen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2008.04.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)00943-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)92490-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(83)90748-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","first-page":"CD001450","article-title":"Routine Doppler ultrasound in pregnancy","author":"Bricker L","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.055"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03313.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","volume-title":"The Investigation and Management of the Small-for-Gestational Age Fetus","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","year":"2002"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.04.035","article-title":"A customized standard to assess fetal growth in a US population","volume":"201","author":"Gardosi J","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.04.034","article-title":"Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles","volume":"201","author":"Gardosi J","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181704e48"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2010.506566"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823dc56e"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01870.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","author":"Gestation Network","journal-title":"GROW: gestation-related optimal weight program, version v5.15"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1977.tb12550.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00656.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01670.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwq411"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10150"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)60364-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2004.00272.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2000.tb01139.x"}],"container-title":["Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.7863%2Fultra.32.9.1581","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.7863%2Fultra.32.9.1581","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.7863\/ultra.32.9.1581","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,30]],"date-time":"2023-10-30T13:10:21Z","timestamp":1698671421000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.7863\/ultra.32.9.1581"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.7863\/ultra.32.9.1581"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7863\/ultra.32.9.1581","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0278-4297","1550-9613"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0278-4297","type":"print"},{"value":"1550-9613","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2012-08-09","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2013-01-14","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2013-09-01","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}