{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,14]],"date-time":"2026-02-14T04:06:35Z","timestamp":1771041995787,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Editorial Committee of Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Infectious Dis","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Jpn J Infect Dis"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,31]]},"DOI":"10.7883\/yoken.jjid.2021.164","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,29]],"date-time":"2021-06-29T22:14:03Z","timestamp":1625004843000},"page":"70-75","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Evaluation of the Diagnostic Algorithms for Serodiagnosis of Syphilis"],"prefix":"10.7883","volume":"75","author":[{"given":"K\u00fcbra","family":"Evren","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Microbiology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rukiye","family":"Berkem","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Microbiology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mihriban","family":"Y\u00fccel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Microbiology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"4631","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"1. Larsen SA, Steiner BM, Rudolph AH. Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8:1-21.","DOI":"10.1128\/CMR.8.1.1"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"2. Lautenschlager S. Diagnosis of syphilis: clinical and laboratory problems. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2006;4:1058-1075.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1610-0387.2006.06072.x"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"3. Nah EH, Cho S, Kim S, et al. Comparison of traditional and reverse syphilis screening algorithms in medical health checkups. Ann Lab Med. 2017;37:511-515.","DOI":"10.3343\/alm.2017.37.6.511"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"4. Peeling RW, Mabey D, Kamb ML, et al. Syphilis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17073.","DOI":"10.1038\/nrdp.2017.73"},{"key":"5","unstructured":"5. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Guidelines for the Treatment of <i>Treponema pallidum<\/i> (syphilis). Geneva: WHO; 2016."},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"6. Binnicker MJ. Which algorithm should be used to screen for syphilis? Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25:79-85.","DOI":"10.1097\/QCO.0b013e32834e9a3c"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"7. Dai S, Chi P, Lin Y, et al. Improved reverse screening algorithm for Treponema pallidum antibody using signal-to-cutoff ratios from chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41:29-34.","DOI":"10.1097\/OLQ.0000000000000066"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"8. Tong ML, Lin LR, Liu LL, et al. Analysis of 3 algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis and implications for clinical management. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:1116-1124.","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/ciu087"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"9. Peng J, Lu Y, Yu H, et al. Analysis of 2 reverse syphilis testing algorithms in diagnosis of syphilis: a large-cohort prospective study. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:947-953.","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/ciy198"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"10. Morshed MG, Singh AE. Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015;22:137-147.","DOI":"10.1128\/CVI.00681-14"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"11. Binnicker MJ, Jespersen DJ, Rollins LO. Direct comparison of the traditional and reverse syphilis screening algorithms in a population with a low prevalence of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:148-150.","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.05636-11"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"12. Yi J, Choi W, Shin S, et al. Strategy for performing treponemal tests in reverse-sequence algorithms of syphilis diagnosis. Clin Biochem. 2019;63:121-125.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2018.09.013"},{"key":"13","unstructured":"13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:133-137."},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"14. Loeffelholz MJ, Binnicker MJ. It is time to use treponema-specific antibody screening tests for diagnosis of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:2-6.","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.06347-11"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"15. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22:276-282.","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2012.031"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"16. Huh HJ, Chung JW, Park SY, et al. Comparison of automated treponemal and nontreponemal test algorithms as first-line syphilis screening assays. Ann Lab Med. 2016;36:23-27.","DOI":"10.3343\/alm.2016.36.1.23"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"17. S\u00f6nmez C. Evaluation of RPR, TPHA test results and diagnostic algorithms used in syphilis diagnosis. Turk Mikrobiyol Cem Derg. 2018;48:72-77. Turkish.","DOI":"10.5222\/TMCD.2018.072"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"18. Park IU, Chow JM, Bolan G, et al. Screening for syphilis with the treponemal immunoassay: analysis of discordant serology results and implications for clinical management. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:1297-1304.","DOI":"10.1093\/infdis\/jir524"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"19. Rourk AR, Nolte FS, Litwin CM. Performance characteristics of the reverse syphilis screening algorithm in a population with a moderately high prevalence of syphilis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016;146:572-577.","DOI":"10.1093\/ajcp\/aqw182"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"20. Berkem R, Karako\u00e7 AE. The evaluation of the reverse algorithm for syphilis screening in blood donors. Revista Romana de Medicina de Laborator. 2019;27:383-388.","DOI":"10.2478\/rrlm-2019-0039"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"21. Sim\u010di\u010d S, Poto\u010dnik M. Serological diagnosis of syphilis: a comparison of different diagnostic methods. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2015;24:17-20.","DOI":"10.15570\/actaapa.2015.6"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"22. Fakile YF, Jost H, Hoover KW, et al. Correlation of treponemal immunoassay signal strength values with reactivity of confirmatory treponemal testing. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;56:e01165-17.","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.01165-17"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"23. Berry GJ, Loeffelholz MJ. Use of treponemal screening assay strength of signal to avoid unnecessary confirmatory testing. Sex Transm Dis. 2016;43:737-740.","DOI":"10.1097\/OLQ.0000000000000524"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"24. Sanfilippo AM, Freeman K, Schmitz JL. Analytical comparison of the architect syphilis TP and Liaison Treponema automated chemiluminescent immunoassays and their performance in a reverse syphilis screening algorithm. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e00215-18.","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.00215-18"},{"key":"25","unstructured":"25. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health, General Directorate of Public Health. Syphilis statistics. Available at &lt;https:\/\/hsgm.saglik.gov.tr\/tr\/bulasici-hastaliklar\/sifiliz\/sifiliz-liste\/sifiliz-istatistik.html&gt;. Accessed February 11, 2021. Turkish."}],"container-title":["Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/yoken\/75\/1\/75_JJID.2021.164\/_pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,29]],"date-time":"2022-01-29T03:54:49Z","timestamp":1643428489000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/yoken\/75\/1\/75_JJID.2021.164\/_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,31]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7883\/yoken.jjid.2021.164","relation":{},"ISSN":["1344-6304","1884-2836"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1344-6304","type":"print"},{"value":"1884-2836","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,31]]},"article-number":"JJID.2021.164"}}