{"status":"ok","message-type":"work-list","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"facets":{},"total-results":3704252,"items":[{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,4]],"date-time":"2026-02-04T03:29:09Z","timestamp":1770175749583,"version":"3.49.0"},"publisher-location":"1 Oliver's Yard,\u00a0\n55 City Road\u00a0 \nLondon\u00a0 \nEC1Y 1SP\u00a0 \nUnited States","reference-count":0,"publisher":"SAGE Publications Ltd","isbn-type":[{"value":"9781529776164","type":"electronic"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"DOI":"10.4135\/9781529776164.n16","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,3]],"date-time":"2026-02-03T15:21:22Z","timestamp":1770132082000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Argumentative Theory"],"prefix":"10.4135","member":"179","container-title":["Reasoning, Judging, Deciding"],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,3]],"date-time":"2026-02-03T15:21:25Z","timestamp":1770132085000},"score":33.10353,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/sk.sagepub.com\/book\/mono\/reasoning-judging-deciding\/toc\/i1116.xml"}},"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"ISBN":["9781529776164"],"references-count":0,"alternative-id":["10.4135\/9781529776164"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781529776164.n16","published":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]],"date-time":"2025-12-15T00:12:03Z","timestamp":1765757523531,"version":"3.48.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Autonoma de Madrid","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,14]],"date-time":"2025-12-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1765670400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["RIA"],"abstract":"<jats:p>In this paper I investigate the relationship between the argument scheme of practical reasoning and multi-party argumentation defined here as an argumentative polylogue. I first focus on the causal premise (\u201cLet us do X, because X leads to Y, and Y is desirable\u201d) typically taken to signify X as either a necessary or a sufficient means to reach Y. I investigate a third option \u2013 a \u201cconducive\u201d means, which is neither necessary nor sufficient, but still worth taking. Second, I consider the notion of \u201cthe best means\u201d. Assuming that alternative means\/options are advocated by different parties to argumentation, we end up with a multi-party deliberation where different contrary alternatives are debated. Multi-party deliberation can on the basis of this be understood as a special case of argumentative polylogue in which proposals for various contrary courses of action are critically examined.Keywords:\u00a0Argumentation, deliberation, polylogue, practical reasoning.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.15366\/ria2014.8.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,27]],"date-time":"2023-11-27T07:29:02Z","timestamp":1701070142000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Practical reasoning in argumentative polylogues"],"prefix":"10.15366","author":[{"given":"Marcin","family":"Lewinski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"6788","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,14]]},"container-title":["Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentaci\u00f3n"],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/revistas.uam.es\/ria\/article\/download\/8162\/19804","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/revistas.uam.es\/ria\/article\/download\/8162\/19804","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]],"date-time":"2025-12-15T00:11:00Z","timestamp":1765757460000},"score":27.131664,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/revistas.uam.es\/ria\/article\/view\/8162"}},"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,14]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,6,25]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15366\/ria2014.8.001","ISSN":["2172-8801"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2172-8801"}],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,14]]}},{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,18]],"date-time":"2026-06-18T15:41:05Z","timestamp":1781797265014,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"University of Windsor Leddy Library","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["IL"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Mercier and Sperber (2011a, 2011b; Mercier, 2011a, 2011b, 2011c, and 2011d) have presented a stimulating and provocative new theory of reasoning: the argumentative theory of reasoning. They maintain that argumentation is a meta-representational module. In their evolutionary view of argumentation, the function of this module would be to regulate the flow of information between interlocutors through persuasiveness on the side of the communicator and epistemic vigilance on the side of the audience. The aim of this paper is to discuss the perspective of the authors in which they conceive this competence as the natural scenario of reflective reasoning.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v32i1.3536","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,27]],"date-time":"2017-03-27T12:00:19Z","timestamp":1490616019000},"page":"132","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Mercier and Sperber\u2019s Argumentative Theory of Reasoning: From Psychology of Reasoning to Argumentation Studies"],"prefix":"10.22329","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"Cristi\u00e1n","family":"Santib\u00e1\u00f1ez Y\u00e1\u00f1ez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"9602","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,8]]},"container-title":["Informal Logic"],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/ojs.uwindsor.ca\/ojs\/leddy\/index.php\/informal_logic\/article\/viewFile\/3536\/2774","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/ojs.uwindsor.ca\/ojs\/leddy\/index.php\/informal_logic\/article\/viewFile\/3536\/2774","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,27]],"date-time":"2017-03-27T12:00:35Z","timestamp":1490616035000},"score":26.7404,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/ojs.uwindsor.ca\/ojs\/leddy\/index.php\/informal_logic\/article\/view\/3536"}},"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,8]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,13]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v32i1.3536","ISSN":["0824-2577","0824-2577"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0824-2577","type":"electronic"},{"value":"0824-2577","type":"print"}],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,8]]}}],"items-per-page":3,"query":{"start-index":0,"search-terms":null}}}